A Look At Our Best Enemies
A Look At Our Best Enemies
"The Arabs are chips"-Hilltop youth
One of the big strategic errors of Kahanism was its myopic focus on the Arabs. Rabbi Kahane saw them as a useful stalking horse for the movement. Most Jews, religious and non-religious, Ashkenazi and Mizrahi, Hasidim, Litvaks and Religious Zionists, dislike the constant stabbings, shootings, rock attacks, theft, rape and arson with which Arabs enrich our national existence.
Of course, the Arabs are merely the stick with which the GOI (Government of Israel) and international community whose satrapy it is beat us, and it was a long term error to focus on them. The current generation of Israeli Jews who have zeal for Hashem understand this. Hence, the “chips” quote-the Arabs are a side dish, not the main meal. Still, they’re worth examining. Who are the Palestinian Arabs, and what do they represent? Why do they fight us, and what will it take for them to stop?
In terms of their own identity, the Arabs identify as members of extended families (tribal communities), and ultimately as Muslims, members of the global umma. Many of the families have very long histories in the Land. Some are converted Jews, such as the Dweik family, which is a branch of the Syrian Jewish Dwek family of Aleppo. Others are Arabs, Kurds, Persians, Bosnians, Albanians, Egyptians, Sudanese. They also frequently have been living here for a long time. For instance, the Tuqan family of Shechem has lived there for many centuries.
Tribal identity implies tribal conflicts, and many of the tribes hate each other more than they hate the Jews. Tribal militias far outnumber both the Palestinian police forces and Palestinian terrorist organizations, and are as well armed. Along with the organized crime groups which permeate Arab society, tribes have an understanding with the Israeli regime-as long as their weapons are used for internal quarrels, the GOI does not interfere forcefully.
In terms of Muslim identity, our Arabs have a fairly standard perspective. Since Muslims submit to the One God and follow His will, it is a desecration of His Name to see Muslims ruled by kafirun and People of the Book. Since the faith of Muhammad is spread by the sword, the desecration increases when Muslims are their subjects in lands which were formerly under Muslim rule. Specifically here, the Palestinians hold the Land in trust for the rest of the Umma. They are forbidden to make their peace with Jewish rule-this is a betrayal of the entire Muslim community. To add insult to injury, Jews have historically been despised and publicly humiliated in the Muslim world, and to be ruled by us is especially humiliating for the Arabs.
Of course, all of this is theory. In practice, many millions of Muslims have shown the ability and willingness to faithfully serve kafir regimes, wear their awards and credentials, and even sacrifice their lives for their masters over the centuries. Given the right set of incentives, Muslims are quite capable of abiding by the law-some of the lowest crime rates in the world are to be found in Muslim countries. So why is the situation so different here?
It is different here because our Arabs neither belong to the Umma nor the state of Israel. Rather, they belong to the “international community,” that is to say, the US government and its satrapies across the world, the GAE (Global American Empire). In this capacity, they fill a role of which they themselves are not conscious, that of an incarnated deity and holy sacrificial victim.
Wait, what?!
The main thing to understand about the GAE is that it’s a religious body, and its religion informs all of its actions and rhetoric, just as much as Catholicism informed the Spanish Empire.
What is the religion of the GAE? It is post-Xtianity, a Xtianity without Jesus or any God whatsoever. Curtis Yarvin described it as Ultracalvinism. This religion inherited and expanded the 19th century American empire, which was missionary Protestant in its ideology. Specifically in the Middle East, 19th century missionaries seamlessly transformed into 20th century diplomats, academics and spies, especially as it became clear that Muslims were uninterested in conversion.
As often happens when the more recently developed parts of a religion are thrown out, what comes to the forefront are the deeper, chthonic parts which remain. In the case of Xtianity, the underlying paradigm is that described by George Frazer in the Golden Bough, his landmark study of mythology and religion. In short, the nature of this world is that it constantly tends to age, decay, grow cold and die. An original sin lies at the core of its existence and leads inexorably to its doom. In order to ensure continued existence, there is a cycle of death and rebirth-winter is followed by spring. Humans must play their part in it through symbolic magic reenactment of death and rebirth in the form of a noble sacrifice. Originally, this sacrifice took the form of a king who would be sacrificed in order that the world be renewed and continue to exist, the sun would come out, rain would fall, green and fertile spring would take the place of dead winter.
A further development of this idea involved the expiation of the world’s sins by the sacrificial victim, whose innocence, suffering, degradation and death in some sense balanced the scale.
Eventually, sacrificial substitutes were found, whether human or animal. From the perspective of the king and ruling class, it is much better to have the sacrifice involve the death of a slave or beast, though one temporarily elevated to a royal status.
The post-Xtian incarnation of this very old idea involves the worship of various groups, both within one’s country and outside of it. The suffering and degraded underclass struggles nobly against the corrupt world, suffering and dying. In this process, the original sins at the heart of national existence-slavery, colonialism, racism, patriarchal oppression-are expiated, allowing the cycle of existence to continue.
The exalted sacrificial victims are substitutes. They are elevated from despised, lowly groups and allowed to behave in regal ways, taking what they please, inflicting violence on their superiors, free from the bounds of convention and law. Their suffering, degradation and death are inherent to the rite. The love of the public, on whose behalf they suffer and for whose sins they atone, and the sympathy of the public with their ordeal, is key to the paradigm. It would be wrong to, for instance, think that the Aztecs who ripped out the nails of their child sacrifices so that their tears would inspire the gods to send rain were cruel or hated the children. Rather, they empathized with their pain deeply, as would the gods. Similarly, sympathy for the tremendous suffering of the martyr underclass in the process of its transformation into the sacrificial redeemer of the world and adoration for that underclass is absolutely essential to the religion of the GAE.
The flip side is that the adored sacrifice should ideally walk to the altar happily, of its own free will, with a smile. Of course, this is not always possible, but it’s the ideal.
Domestically, the American post-Xtians have grown their own holy sacrificial victims. Overseas, their role must be filled by others. In our case, that is the Palestinian Arabs, who are martyred both individually and as a group. The latter involves some fancy footwork-it’s a bit difficult to paint a group with one of the highest obesity rates in the world as victims of oppression on par with the Holocaust while keeping a straight face-but when you hold the megaphone, it’s not really a problem.
Of course, in order for the imperial sacrifice rites to continue, the executioners must participate. In our case, that requires that the Arabs engage in a constant campaign of violence against the Jews, and that the Jews be prevented from crushing them once and for all by time tested means. Both are easily done for an empire which prints the world’s reserve currency at will. Arab violence-sorry, I mean to say “resistance”-is encouraged by Western academia, NGOs, funding, much of it laundered through “indigenous” institutions. An effective response on the Israeli side is impossible as long as our state is an American satrapy, coopted entirely by soft power, bribery of the state as a whole and its key actors individually.
The sacrificial victims continue joyfully prostrating themselves on the altar. Their executioners fulfill their role, while expressing their empathy for the victims. The audience weeps for their suffering and is grateful for their role in absolving the original sins so that the world may continue. Of course, you can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs, but considering the stakes…
> It is different here because our Arabs neither belong to the Umma nor the state of Israel. Rather, they belong to the “international community,” that is to say, the US government and its satrapies across the world, the GAE (Global American Empire).
They belong to both the Umma and the GAE. Thus as members of the Umma they wage jihad against Israel, and as members of the GAE they become sacred victims when Isreal defends itself.
I don't think it's entirely fair to analyze GAE as a Christian phenomenon when many of its staunchest and most effective supporters are themselves Jews. Their ideology, while I agree it contains elements of Christianity, also has a certain level of hostility to white Europeans.